![]() ![]() (port forwarding)ġ92.168.1.1 = Default Gateaway (Asus router) Wan settings for my firewall in asus router i've only opened port 9001 and port 5001 (tcp/udp) towards the UMP machine, cause i sometimes streams outside of LAN. ![]() I've got a software NAT (KIS2019) wich includes a firewall, the UMP server is on a 5 GHz WIFI connection under 192.168.1.131 (binded LAN ip in my router) (behind a Asus-RT-AC68 Router), running Merlin Firmware 384.8_2. Is this not enough to control Lan/Wan acces towards the UMP software? I assumed UMP controlled LAN/WAN request hence the "Enable external network" is disabled so you can't reach it outside of you lan?!. Ty for your answer, im kinda novice to this but trying to figure out what's happening and why! You'd need to post debug files and give a precise description of your network topology for anyone to be able to help you figure it out. Chances that a bug in UMS shows stuff that's not actually there, or that your LAN has devices you're not aware of, are much greater. Whatever the source is of the "unknown renderers" you see, they doesn't come from the Internet. This simply doesn't happen by accident, so unless you have specifically done so we can exclude that as a possibility. If it does, it's because multicast routing somehow has been configured both on your router and on the remote location, in a way that lets them exchange multicast packets. So, to sum it up: I very much doubt that UMS "finds" devices from your WAN. Neither does it support IPv6, which would have made all this much more tricky. Internet routers don't forward multicast packets, so UMS shouldn't be discoverable outside your LAN even if you have no firewall or NAT in your router. The discovery protocol (SSDP) used by UPnP/DLNA and thus UMS doesn't implement any kind of authentication or other "security" feature, but it requires multicast to work. There is no need to do any portforwarding to use UMS, and you should not do so. You should make sure that WAN addresses can't reach UMS, for example by using NAT. UMS isn't "secure" in any way, it doesn't control access (except for the primitive IP filter and "code" functionality). ![]() Ums_dbg_-01-05.zip (34.What you're saying doesn't make much sense. had full control of all files in that HD.Īnyway, I would appreciate some UMS wisdom to help with these issues. I also checked the security properties to ensure that my admin acct. I even installed the older UMS build, but had the same problems. One issue is that I had no problem playing older avi. Searching the Forum, I could only find an entry from 2014 regarding unplayable avi files, suggested the obsolete "force avi" in the Transcoding Settings tab. Attempts to use the #Transcode folder for such files resulted in a "no video files found" return. No renderers were detected in the Status tab.ģ) I reinstalled UMS v10.4.1 again, and noted that it wouldn't play older avi files, despite listing them in the appropriate directory. When I followed the procedure listed in the Forum to report an issue, I packed the debug files and restarted UMS, resulting in the same serious error. I reinstalled UMS after deleting all UMS-related registry entries, and the problem persists. In the log, it continually searches and finds "unknown renderer", to the tune that the logfile in the UMS directory gets large (over 1Mb).Ģ) I reinstalled UMS v10.4.1 and when I shut it down, the next startup of UMS caused a "Serious error.failed to establish loopback connection. I am running Windows 10 Pro 圆4 on a new ROG Maximus XII mobo, with 64G Ram, with UMS installed on a 4G M2 drive.ġ) Upon startup, UMS recognizes two instances of Sony UBP1000ES. Aloha, I have three problems with UMS 10.4.1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |