So, that is it for the math of the overall trade. For the Rockets, as they were taking on more, they needed to fit the deal within the upper limit, which, having been between $0 and $6,533,333 above the $123,655,000 salary cap threshold at the time of the trade, meant they could take back a maximum of 175% plus $100,000 of whatever they were sending out. Giving out the larger amount and taking back less, the math of the overall trade was no problem for Oklahoma City. The combined salaries of Favors/Harkless/Jerome/Maledon equal $20,838,867 the combined salaries of Brown/Chriss/Burke/Nwada equal $13,515,920. Neither the Thunder or Rockets are or will be taxpayers, and neither is under the salary cap. Currently, the parameters of what a trade's math must look like varies, dependent on how much they are sending out, and whether or not they are a luxury tax payer. Over the course of various Collective Bargaining Agreements, those rules have been slightly loosened up. For teams operating over the salary cap - which is almost always almost every team - the only way to facilitate player trades is to meet the salary matching rules set out by the Traded Player Exception (which, while colloquially and confusingly used in the discourse to refer to the instrument generated by non-simultaneous trades, is both here and in the CBA's language itself used to refer simply to the exception that grants teams over the salary cap the ability to make trades at all). In the aggregate, it is widely understood that the outgoing and incoming salaries in a trade must near-enough counterbalance each other. That same difference between the overall trade and each individual team's structuring of their side of it from their point of view is also key to understanding the math behind the deal, the exceptions created by it, and, following on from there, the purpose of doing it. Yet because of the Thunder's manner of structuring the deal, as will be broken down below, Harkless's salary was not being used in aggregation with any of the others, and thus he was able to be sent out in the trade despite the presence of the other three players. It is a common misconception that players privy to this rule cannot be dealt in multi-player trades - in actuality, they can, as long as the trade is structured as separate, parallel trades in which the relevant player's salary is not aggregated.īecause they have all been with their respective teams for longer than two months, as above, this issue of aggregation does not apply to seven of the eight players in the deal. Specifically, it actually states that players cannot be traded within two months of acquisition if their salary is being aggregated with that of another or others. This rule, however, is often misunderstood. Having been acquired in the aforementioned Krejci trade earlier in the week, it would follow that Harkless could not be traded again alongside the other trio in this way. A fairly well-known rule states that players acquired by trade cannot be traded again for two months after their initial acquisition unless traded on their own, which, on first pass, Harkless was not here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |